地图标注

... (intro)

... (not friend's fault)

... (高德)

... (百度)

... (苹果)

... (常见坑定位)

... (坑选错分类)

... (进阶玩法: 收藏夹标注)

... (还有一种情况... 位置被系统纠正)

... (再说一个进阶玩法: 收藏夹标注) Wait this repeats? Actually after paragraph 9, there is paragraph 10: "再说一个进阶玩法：给常去的地方做“收藏夹标注”。" That's duplicate of paragraph 8? Let's read: after paragraph 9, the next paragraph starts "再说一个进阶玩法：给常去的地方做“收藏夹标注”。" That's indeed duplicate of paragraph 8 content but maybe they added extra details? Actually paragraph 8 already covered collection marking. Paragraph 10 repeats but maybe adds more? Let's read paragraph 10: "再说一个进阶玩法：给常去的地方做“收藏夹标注”。不是每个地方你都有权新增，比如朋友的办公室、常去钓鱼的河边，这些地方你没法在地图上“占位”，但可以把它们存进收藏夹，自己加备注。高德和百度都支持给收藏的地点自定义名称，比如把某个停车场存成“周三打球停这里”，把某个小区门口存成“接娃等她的地方”。下次导航的时候，直接搜你自己的备注名就能出来，比搜地址快多了。" That's same as paragraph 8. So maybe they duplicated inadvertently. Then paragraph 11: "还有一种情况值得一提：你标注的位置被系统纠正了..." Actually that's paragraph 9 in original? Let's check: In the original after paragraph 8, there is paragraph 9: "还有一种情况值得一提：你标注的位置被系统纠正了..." That's paragraph 9. Then paragraph 10: "再说一个进阶玩法：给常去的地方做“收藏夹标注”。" That's duplicate. Then paragraph 11: "还有一种情况值得一提：你标注的位置被系统纠正了。有时候你明明标对了，过几天系统给你“修正”到别处去了。..." Actually that's same as paragraph 9? Hmm confusion.Let's re-extract from user text:The user posted:

... (intro)

... (not friend's fault)

... (高德)

... (百度)

... (苹果)

... (说完怎么标，再说坑)

... (还有个坑是分类选错)

... (再说一个进阶玩法：给常去的地方做“收藏夹标注”. ...)

... (还有一种情况值得一提：你标注的位置被系统纠正了...)

... (再说一个进阶玩法：给常去的地方做“收藏夹标注”. ...)

...